印度的職訓可分成四類，第一類為侷限於職前教育的產業培訓機構，過去7年內增長至12000所，其中有2000所為公立，其餘為私立，大部分的私立機構尚未受到官方承認。第二類是自2010年起由國家技能發展局（National Skill Development Corporation, NSDC）（註1）輔導且大量成長的職訓中心。雖然由政府贊助，這些中心還是以營利性組織為雛型。第三，高中11和12年級設有技職相關課程，但僅有5%的適齡學生會申請。自2012年起，印度政府已經頒布新的教育綱要，國中9和10年級也將引進技術課程。最後一類是公司內部的在職訓練，但僅有16%的大公司會提供，中國的企業則有85%。
印度勞動力中大多數人都是靠自己摸索學習技能，擴展職訓課程和建立承認原有技能並結合學習的系統屬當務之急。我帶領政府團隊所制訂的國家技能認證綱要（The National Skills Qualification Framework）便是職訓課程發展的依歸。
[作者介紹：Santosh Mehrotra ]
新德里Jawaharlal Nehru大學經濟系教授。著有India’s Skills Challenge: Reforming Vocational Education and Training to Harness the Demographic Dividend
- Vocational Education and Training Reform in India
- Vocational Education in india
- A Subsidiary of Emerge Learning Services (P) Ltd, recognized and funded by NSDC
India’s Skills Challenge: Reforming Vocational Education and Training to Harness the Demographic Dividend
The Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) system in India needs to expand very rapidly if it is to serve the interests of the 5-6 million youth joining the labour force every year, and of an economy that is both growing rapidly as well diversifying fast.
However, the majority of India’s workforce either has less than primary education or is illiterate (53%). Moreover, less than 10% of the workforce has acquired vocational skills, although that proportion is higher if we take only the non-agricultural workforce into account (20%), and even higher if we take only the industrial workforce into account (44%). While the increase in percentage seems good it is far below comparable countries and needs to increase.
India’s skill development system has four parts. First, a very narrowly based pre-employment training system of Industrial Training Institutes (grown to about 12,000 in the last 7 years, of which 2,000 are public, the rest private). Second, there are a rapidly growing number of formal vocational training providers that are being incubated by the National Skill Development Corporation after 2010, based on a for-profit business model, though somewhat subsidised by government. Third, vocational education is offered in senior secondary schools in classes 11-12 (which barely enrol 5% of the relevant age cohort); since 2012 government secondary schools have also begun to offer vocational education in classes 9-10, thanks to the introduction of the National Skills Qualification Framework. Finally, there is the in-firm training provided on recruitment by companies (but only 16% of Indian companies provides such training, and that too only large ones, in contrast to 85% of firms in China).
India must therefore expand TVET to cater to the majority already in the labour force who have informally acquired skills, so that recognition of prior skills and learning becomes systemic. The National Skills Qualification Framework (the base document for which was drafted by a task force of the government led by the author) makes provisions for this monumental task.
The productivity of India’s workforce is lower than many comparator countries. If India is to become a major manufacturing power, productivity in the economy needs to improve significantly. We have to create an ecosystem that promotes and rewards skills and productivity; Government, industry and private vocational training providers need to work together to realize this objective.
To realize India’s demographic dividend we need to meet India’s skills challenge. Since economic growth took off over the last decade, non-agricultural jobs have been expanding at a rate roughly comparable to the rate at which the labour force is growing. However, it is the quality of jobs that are a matter of concern. If skilled workers don’t become available to industry at a rate comparable to the growth of demand for skills, manufacturers will increasingly resort to more capital-intensive technologies, which will lock India into a pattern of growth that is synch with its comparative advantage – relative abundant labour power.
Only large firms offer apprenticeships, and in a country with a workforce of 485 million, there are under 300,000 formal apprentices. The rest are all informal apprentices, who tend to be exploited by their employers. Changes are certainly needed in the Apprenticeship Act 1961.
While some progress towards reforming TVET in India has been made, a huge and broad ranging agenda for reform lies before the government and industry.
Industry needs to get involved to a much greater extent than ever before in TVET. Both large industries, many of which are engaged in in-house training, as well as small and medium enterprises, will need to find ways to increase in-firm training. Industry must make hiring formally trained skilled personnel an integral part of its human resource policy and include processes and practice to reward skills. Industry will also need to offer its human resources to vocational secondary schools, industrial training institutes and private vocational training providers, so that the number of instructors with practical experience increases by a very large number.
[ Author： Santosh Mehrotra ]
He is Professor of Economics, Centre for Labour and Informal Sector Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. Previously, he was Director-General at the National Institute of Labour Economics Research and Development (NILERD, earlier called Institute of Applied Manpower Research), Planning Commission of India.
圖片來源：flickr@GlobalPartnership for Education
原文刊登於《NORRAG NEWSBite》，經作者Santosh Mehrotra授權編譯，未經許可不得轉載